.png)
Advantages:
Bunting played on Toronto.
Seider and Raymond played big minutes and first-unit PP minutes from game 1.
There's no greater advantage than minutes.
Points/60 @ 5 on 5
Bunting, 3.16
Boldy 3.0
Jarvis 2.33
Zegras 2.3
Lundell 2.28
Jeannot 1.87
Pitlick 1.86
Mercer 1.81
Raymond 1.73 - 10th
On defense, I don't care so much.
Seider was 6th - but he clearly impacted games in ways not measured in goals and assists.
But Raymond?
He was a soft, one-dimensional player who feasted with big-time minutes with two proven vets.
You can cut out the old rookie if you want.
But what about Jarvis? Zegras? Lundell?
Calder talk
-
Fil Zaronek
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:42 am
- Has thanked: 421 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
-
Pop Zeus
- Posts: 7014
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2020 1:35 pm
- Has thanked: 763 times
- Been thanked: 1277 times
yeah....bunting didn't benefit at all from being 40 and playing with Matthews and Marner all year..... Raymond was on one of the worst teams in the league, yes he played with T-Bert and Larks, that's nothing compared to bunting. Also being on a shitty team makes it harder to producePop Zeus wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 12:34 am Advantages:
Bunting played on Toronto.
Seider and Raymond played big minutes and first-unit PP minutes from game 1.
There's no greater advantage than minutes.
Points/60 @ 5 on 5
Bunting, 3.16
Boldy 3.0
Jarvis 2.33
Zegras 2.3
Lundell 2.28
Jeannot 1.87
Pitlick 1.86
Mercer 1.81
Raymond 1.73 - 10th
On defense, I don't care so much.
Seider was 6th - but he clearly impacted games in ways not measured in goals and assists.
But Raymond?
He was a soft, one-dimensional player who feasted with big-time minutes with two proven vets.
You can cut out the old rookie if you want.
But what about Jarvis? Zegras? Lundell?